CO129-508-5 Supreme Court of Hong Kong- slackness of registry accounting methods 28-10-1927 - 23-4-1928 — Page 161

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

161

Q:6

4:6

Q:7

A:7

Q:8

A:8

Q:9

A:9

Q:10

4:10

Q:11

4:11

Q:12

A:12

Q:13

A:13

Has the Company assets from which the sums due

to the Court could be recovered?

No.

When goods were sold under distraint or

execution did the auctioneers send their account sales

in envelopes addressed to you?

Account sales never came to me personally.

Who opens envelopes addressed to the Registrar?

Either Mr. Melbourne or I.

Did you take any steps to see that the proceeds

of sales came in?

I regarded it as a matter delegated to Melbourne.

He signs all orders for sales. It was his duty to see

that the proceeds were paid in.

1

Whose duty was it to keep proper records of

distraint and execution sales and of the proceeds and to

see that the proceeds are duly paid in? Mr. Melbourne

appears to regard the First Bailiff as the responsible

person.

The first Bailiff's. It would be his duty to

point out to Mr. Melbourne if money was not being paid in.

The First Bailiff would get the information as to the

amount of the net proceeds from the account sales.

1

To whom did the account sales go?

I think they went to Mr. Hill.

Were they always accompanied by cheques?

In the past they were.

Should the posting of the date of account

rendered in the Bailiffs Record of Sales Book mean that

the money had been paid in?

Yes.

61

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.